New Entry Rule Sparks Frustration Among Outdoor Users
Utah officials are revisiting a law passed earlier this year that obliges adults to hold a hunting or fishing license to enter many of the state’s Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs). Enacted through HB-309, the rule was designed to have all visitors help fund conservation and maintenance efforts. Yet the requirement has drawn widespread criticism from hikers, birdwatchers, and cyclists, who argue the state is effectively charging residents to use public lands that were once freely accessible.
Proposals Range From Full Repeal to Alternative Passes
Legislators are exploring several potential changes ahead of the next session. Some want to repeal the law entirely and restore unrestricted access to WMAs. Others are pushing for modified versions, such as a lower-cost recreation permit, volunteer work credits, or short educational programs to replace the license fee. Supporters of HB-309 maintain that non-hunters should contribute financially to the stewardship of these lands, while opponents say the policy unfairly burdens people who use the outdoors in non-consumptive ways.
Lawmakers Confront Enforcement and Communication Issues
The law’s rollout has also revealed confusion over where licenses apply, since many popular trails cross between WMAs and other public lands with few clear boundary markers. Lawmakers have acknowledged that the rule’s enforcement and signage problems must be resolved if any form of the policy continues. The debate reflects a growing tension in Utah over how to balance conservation funding with affordable access as outdoor recreation grows in popularity statewide.
